How does Bad Company 1 still have the best graphics? [on consoles]
#1
Posted 31 January 2012 - 01:49 AM
Like, look at them.
I played it for a year straight, and I still firmly believe it has the best graphics out of all the Battlefield games ever released on consoles.
How.... how have they [DICE] been downgrading in graphics more and more?
*disclaimer. I don't care about graphics. I don't care about Battlefield 3's graphics. I'm simply saying what I notice. Does anyone else think so?
Sidenote, I believe that Bad Company 1 also still is closer to the Battlefield 2 experience than BFBC2 or BF3 (on consoles).

Quote
#2
Posted 31 January 2012 - 02:11 AM
#3
Posted 31 January 2012 - 02:23 AM
VW Man 53, on 31 January 2012 - 02:11 AM, said:
VW Man 53, on 31 January 2012 - 02:11 AM, said:
Well that doesnt really matter. I have never played BFBC1 so i cannot comment on this topic, but if a game's highest selling point is graphics (game changing graphics at that), you cannot deliver a game with less graphics than a game released many years ago.
(like so many other broken promises from BF3)
#5
Posted 31 January 2012 - 03:08 AM
Translation: get glasses.
#6
Posted 31 January 2012 - 03:16 AM
Neutron2, on 31 January 2012 - 03:08 AM, said:
Translation: get glasses.
2. That analogy is completely unrelated.
3. Have you played BC1?
4. i have and wear glasses.
I really only need input on the 3rd point. Everything you say is invalid if you didn't play BC1.
Edited by HardcoreHobo, 31 January 2012 - 03:17 AM.

Quote
#9
Posted 31 January 2012 - 01:28 PM
And yes, I play on 360.
I'm not still not sure about comparing BF3 graphics with BC1&2, I think it was a different sort of art style too it, although I guess in terms of pixel count and shaders and all that sort of thing, than yes, BF3 has slightly worse graphics to BC1&2 (on console).
#10
Posted 31 January 2012 - 02:33 PM
You're playing on an oudated system; I don't care if they keep making games for it 30 years from now. It's outdated and it's starting to show it's age. I just played PS3 a little while ago with some friends, and I was blown away at how horrible it looked, and I have it displaying at max. Same with the 360.
When BC1 was released it was released at the peak of the consoles performance. It doesn't have as much going on either.
Until the next gen comes out, you won't see much change in graphics. The ceiling was hit a couple years ago.
#11
Posted 01 February 2012 - 04:34 AM
HardcoreHobo, on 31 January 2012 - 03:16 AM, said:
2. That analogy is completely unrelated.
3. Have you played BC1?
4. i have and wear glasses.
I really only need input on the 3rd point. Everything you say is invalid if you didn't play BC1.
2) it was to make a point
3) yes, in fact I got all the way up to Colonel and made it to the second highest skill level
4) okay.
Edited by Neutron2, 01 February 2012 - 04:36 AM.
#12
Posted 01 February 2012 - 05:39 AM
Like it, subscribe, sh*t talk to me, its whatever.
#14
Posted 04 February 2012 - 05:43 PM
#15
Posted 06 February 2012 - 12:19 AM
LanThaKid, on 04 February 2012 - 05:43 PM, said:

Quote
#16
Posted 06 February 2012 - 05:28 AM
HardcoreHobo, on 06 February 2012 - 12:19 AM, said:
He's got a point, if you are discussing graphics, console versions aren't really worth mentioning.
Edited by FrankDaTank1218, 06 February 2012 - 05:28 AM.
Like it, subscribe, sh*t talk to me, its whatever.
#17
Posted 07 February 2012 - 02:25 AM
FrankDaTank1218, on 06 February 2012 - 05:28 AM, said:
#18
Posted 07 February 2012 - 02:55 AM
Like it, subscribe, sh*t talk to me, its whatever.
#19
Posted 07 February 2012 - 05:21 PM
Or, this is much more unlikely, but leave the forums? No one here seems to like you.
Back to the topic please.

Quote
#20
Posted 07 February 2012 - 06:30 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














